|
Memorandum
of Understanding
Edison Electric Institute
and the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
I. Parties
The parties to this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) are the Edison
Electric Institute member utilities (EEI) and the U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service).
II.
Purpose
This MOU establishes a partnership between EEI and the Service to
promote mutually beneficial Integrated Vegetation Management (IVM)
on EEI member utility Rights-of-Way (ROW) on Service lands. In addition
to provide an opportunity for the Service to use, at benchmarked
costs, EEI's contractors to carry out vegetation management practices
on other Service-owned lands. These actions can improve the management
of Service-owned lands and overlaying ROW's by maintaining forest
health, improving wildlife habitat, and reducing the occurrence
of non-native invasive plant species.
III.
Background Information
Electric utilities are charged by state and federal regulatory agencies
with the responsibility to provide safe, reliable electric service
to their customers. Customers may include homeowners, businesses,
factories, municipalities, government and other utilities. Electricity
is essential for domestic use, economic growth, providing for national
security and other vital services. To meet these demands the pathways
or rights-of-way (ROW) for the flow of electricity must be kept
open and secure at all times.
Trees
and other vegetation can cause interruptions of service by growing
into or falling through power lines. A loss of service is not only
costly and inconvenient to customers it can sever vital national
security links and be life threatening to people on life support
systems and in other vulnerable situations. For many utilities,
tree caused power outages rank among the leading causes of interruptions
of electric service during both normal-operating conditions and
during major storm events.
In addition to minimizing tree-caused power outages, properly maintained
ROW are essential to provide for the safety of both the public and
utility workers. Unimpeded access through ROW for inspection and
maintenance of facilities and for the timely restoration of service
during emergency conditions is vital.
The goal of ROW vegetation management programs is to provide for
the safe transmission and distribution of electricity and to minimize
interruptions caused by trees and other vegetation. This must be
accomplished, to the greatest extent possible, while maintaining
a harmonious relationship with adjoining land uses and the environment.
INTEGRATED
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
Most electric utilities apply a combination of control
methods to provide for ROW vegetation management using a process
termed "Integrated Vegetation Management" (IVM). IVM describes
a methodical process for controlling vegetation:
Problematic
trees are identified,
Action thresholds are considered.
Various control options are evaluated.
Selected control(s) are implemented.
Control
options may include biological, chemical, cultural, manual, or mechanical
techniques. The choice of control option(s) is based on effectiveness,
environmental impact, site characteristics, worker and public health
and safety concerns, and economics. IVM also frequently includes
prescribed burning. However, fire is difficult to control along
a linear corridor and since smoke can create a path to ground, potentially
shorting out high voltage lines and creating electric hazard for
people on the ground, prescribed burns should not be applied to
electric utility rights-of-way. If federal managers must use fire
in or near transmission rights-of-way, as in establishing a firebreak
during wildfire emergencies, they should first contact the operating
utility to coordinate safe operations.
The
desired outcome of IVM is the development of lush and stable shrub/grass/forb
communities that do not interfere with overhead power lines, pose
a fire hazard, and/or hamper access. With proper selective management,
the low growing vegetation can eventually dominate the ROW and inhibit
the tall growing vegetation, thus providing cultural and biological
control of the incompatible species and reducing the need for future
treatments. Other benefits include reduced erosion, enhanced plant
diversity, and the establishment of a sustainable supply of forage
and cover for wildlife as well as corridors for wildlife movement
and wildlife viewing opportunities. The establishment of native
vegetation will also reduce the invasion of noxious weeds into the
corridor.
A well-managed
utility corridor is truly ecosystem management that can convert
a fragmented landscape to a habitat-enriched ecosystem, or create
habitat connectivity between ecosystems, by utilizing IVM technologies.
IVM can create old field or meadow ecosystems of low growing plant
communities that have become rare and thus provide for the natural
habitat necessary for the survival of rare and endangered plants
and animals.
IVM
METHODS
Integrated Vegetation Management techniques will be used
for prevention and suppression of undesirable plant species. These
include but are not limited to:
Manual
and mechanical cutting, where wood debris can be left on site to
enrich the soil.
Cultural
methods, where desirable vegetation is given the ability to thrive
and compete with unwanted tree species for sunlight, nutrients and
water.
Biological
methods, where desirable low growing plants and animals suppress
the growth of unwanted trees through their respective use of competition,
allelopathy and seed consumption by small animals.
Chemical
herbicide for the treatment of incompatible tall growing trees and
vines to stop their growth and remove them from the ROW.
Studies
have demonstrated that such a plan involves maintaining ROW corridors
as distinct zones. (Figure 1). Properly managed, linear corridors
can become an asset for forest ecology and forest management. The
benefits to wildlife associated with the "edge-effect"
are well documented by the 50 years of research at the Bramble and
Byrnes study areas. Such corridors also have the potential to serve
as fire breaks and/or staging areas and access points to assist
in fire fighting efforts.
FIGURE
1
The
wire zone is the area immediately beneath the conductors - most
vegetation here will be limited to low-growing shrubs, herbs, and
grasses; all trees and tall shrubs are removed.
Two
border zones are located on each either side of the wire zone, where
a tall shrub/low shrub/herb/grass cover will develop; only tall-growing
tree species are removed.
The
specific management technique selected for a particular site is
based upon various conditions, which include terrain, accessibility,
environmental considerations (wetlands, streams, etc.) cultural
factors and availability of labor. Vegetation height, density and
species are other prime factors. The electric voltage carried by
the particular power lines involved typically determines the conductor
clearing requirements within power line ROW (see Table 1 adapted
from the National Electric Safety Code). Other important considerations
include the remoteness of the section of line, physical land features,
aesthetic and environmental considerations, adjacent land use, the
risk of fire danger, predominant tree species, etc.
CLEARANCE
DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
The clearance distances are the minimum necessary to provide
safe and reliable electric service. Additional clearance should
be taken at the time of maintenance to account for expected growth
between maintenance cycles.
TABLE
1
Minimum Safe Clearance Zone at the Time of Maintenance*
| VOLTAGE |
SIDE
CLEARANCE DISTANCE* |
OVERHANG
CLEARANCE DISTANCE |
UNDER
CLEARANCE DISTANCE** |
SECONDARY |
4'0" |
4'0" |
4'0" |
7.2
kV - 20.5 kV
|
10'
0"
|
None
Permitted
|
13'
4"
|
20.6
- 32.5 kV
|
12'8"
|
None
Permitted
|
15'
0"
|
32.6
kV - 69 kV
|
15'
4"
|
None
Permitted
|
18'
4"
|
69.1
kV - 115 kV
|
15'
8"
|
None
Permitted
|
20'
8"
|
115.1
kV - 138 kV
|
16'
4"
|
None
Permitted
|
24'
4"
|
138.1
kV - 161 kV
|
16'
8"
|
None
Permitted
|
26'
0"
|
161.1
kV - 230 kV
|
18'
0"
|
None
Permitted
|
29'
4"
|
230.1
kV - 345 kV
|
20'
4"
|
None
Permitted
|
35'
8"
|
| 345.1
kV - 500 kV
|
24'
0"
|
None
Permitted
|
41'
4"
|
T
EEI Vegetation Management Subcommittee recommends these clearances
for trees as Adapted from the National Electric Safety Code, Section
23 clearances.
* Allow
additional clearance distances for fast-growing species
** Under
clearances, tall growing trees that can encroach with the NESC standards
and coniferous trees shall be removed.
Environmentally
responsible land management is in everyone’s best interests.
Performing ground-to-sky /wall-to-wall clearing of the entire ROW
is commonly neither a necessity nor a desirable practice. Achieving
the minimum conductor clearances (Table 1 & Figure 2) can be
accomplished with minimal impact to the environment.
Figure
2
In an effort to meet the needs of Federal land managers the
utility may be directed to modify the wire zone / border zone method
to include additional clearing in order to minimize ladder fuels,
particularly on the northeast or up-hill side of the ROW.
SITE
SPECIFIC VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
There are certain circumstances where it may be necessary
to curtail the extent of vegetation clearing performed at a particular
location. Areas such as ravines, stream buffers, and visually sensitive
areas may require less intensive clearing. The clearing requirements
for these areas will vary, depending on the nature of the vegetation
present and topography. Generally, control of tall-growing species
will be limited as follows:
Ravines
- Clearing or treatment of vegetation is generally unnecessary in
areas such as deep valleys and canyons where the conductor-to-ground
clearance exceeds 100 feet; trees will normally not grow tall enough
to infringe into the conductor zone. The topography as well as the
type of vegetation involved dictates the extent of clearing necessary.
Trees that exceed 100 feet from ground to conductor will be selectively
removed on a case-by-case basis.
Stream
Crossings/Buffers – An abundance of low-growing vegetation
should be encouraged to flourish along stream crossings in order
to prevent erosion and preserve water quality. Tall-growing vegetation
should be eliminated using appropriate IVM techniques as it monopolizes
the availability of sunlight, soil moisture and nutrients thereby
hampering the development of low-growing vegetation.
Road
Screens –Shrubbery and low-growing vegetation should be encouraged
to develop as screens along major roads that are determined to be
important visually sensitive crossings. Tall-growing trees should
be selectively removed with minimal disturbance to understory low-growing
vegetation. Shrub screens should not be developed where wildlife-viewing
opportunities are a priority.
TREE PRUNING
All trees shall be pruned following American National
Standard Institute's, ANSI-A300 standards for tree care operations.
TREE REMOVAL
A. Extensive pruning will result in an unnatural ‘wall’
effect along either side of power line corridors. Therefore trees
rooted outside the established ROW that require more than 25% of
the crown to be removed should be cut down so that healthy and aesthetically
pleasing tree edges are developed. To that end, selective tree removal
techniques shall be practiced to create a staggered tree line along
the outside edges of ROW corridors.
B. Tree
removal within corridors should adhere to the wire zone / border
zone technique and is limited primarily to tall-growing species
that have the potential to interfere with power lines.
C. Upon
discovery, danger trees should be removed during normal maintenance
or as noted during ROW inspections.
D. Dead
trees that can be reached by an aerial lift or that can be climbed
safely should be pruned of only those branches that are a direct
threat to the conductors or other equipment. The remainder of the
tree should be left standing, as there is no possibility of the
tree growing into the conductors again. These trees can serve as
den trees and provide valuable wildlife habitat.
DANGER
TREES
Danger trees are trees located within or adjacent to the
ROW that present a hazard because they have the potential to either
make direct contact with the conductor or pass by the conductor
close enough to cause a flash-over of electricity. Danger trees
can be placed into three categories:
Fall-into
trees are unstable trees that are dead, dying, diseased, weak, brittle,
structurally damaged, leaning, subject to wind-throw, and those
with damaged or eroded root systems.
Bend-into
trees are trees located off of or adjacent to the ROW that have
tops or branches that when broken or bent by wind or under load
of wind, snow, ice, another fallen limb, etc. could violate the
minimum safe distance to the conductor.
Grow-into
trees are trees located off of or adjacent to the ROW with branches
that have grown or will grow horizontally and/or vertically toward
the conductors.
SLASH,
LOGS and STUMPS
Logs and slash that result from ROW clearing operations
should be handled by the following means in consideration of adjoining
land uses, terrain, aesthetics, fire concerns, etc. of the area
involved.
A. Slash
and logs may either be placed into piles or lopped and scattered
throughout the immediate area in a manner such that debris lies
within 24” of the ground.
B. Stumps
shall not exceed 6” in height and shall be cut flat and as
close to the ground and parallel to the slope.
C. No
slash shall be placed within 25 feet of the high mark of streams
or other bodies of water.
D. When
appropriate, trees and debris may be windrowed along ROW edge.
HERBICIDE
APPLICATIONS
EEI electric utilities have adopted a strategy to assist
in the planning and implementation of herbicide application programs.
EEI member companies have joined with the Environmental Protection
Agency in the Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program (PESP),
a voluntary program to reduce risk to both humans and the environment.
The Strategy developed best management practices (BMP's) that guide
the use of herbicide application techniques to reduce the amount
of herbicides applied to a managed area over time. The BMP's will
ensure that practical measures are being taken to reduce both pesticide
use and risk in order to meet the objectives of the PESP program.
IV.
EEI's Responsibilities
EEI agrees to:
A
) Coordinate with each respective Refuge Manager prior
to implementing ROW habitat management. ROW habitat management will
consider impacts to threatened and endangered species, rare or sensitive
plant communities, breeding/nesting of birds and other wildlife,
cultural and historic resources, and other areas of refuge management
concern.
B
) Submit a Pesticide Use Proposal to each respective Refuge
Manager covering each proposed herbicide use and include the relevant
Environmental Protection Agency pesticide use label.
C
) Apply herbicides in accordance with label instructions
and Service/U. S. Department of the Interior-approved Pesticide
Use Proposals.
D
) Provide an annual report to each refuge of all pesticides
applied on the refuge by January 31 of the following year.
E
) Make available to the Service wood chips from tree pruning
operations for use in constructing trails or other purposes.
F
) Use IVM techniques in its ROW's within Service-owned
lands. EEI shall:
- Place
the debris from tree pruning and tree removal into windrows along
the ROW edge, or as directed, to provide additional wildlife habitat.
If this is not possible, the debris shall be chipped and chips made
available to the Service;
- Preserve
beneficial plant species that meet the objectives of the ROW as
much as possible;
- Minimize
the amount of herbicides used over time by employing appropriate
IVM techniques of the least hazardous product, and rotate the approved
herbicides applied in order to minimize the chance of herbicide-resistant
strains;
- Utilize
approved biological controls appropriate to the IVM goals when practical;
- Attempt to eradicate non-native, invasive plant species that interfere
with the ROW vegetation management objectives; and
- Maintain
written documentation of all ROW maintenance activities on ROW's
withinService-owned lands, and provide this documentation to the
Service upon request.
G
) Help the Service promote IVM techniques to other companies
and entities that manage ROW's on Service-owned lands. This assistance
could include instructors and demonstrations of these techniques
.H
) Help the Service manage vegetation/habitat on Service-owned
lands by helping to train Service employees to use IVM techniques,
or by providing trained personnel and equipmentat benchmarked costs.
I
) Share its transmission system maps with the Service to
assist with fire management operations.
V.
Service ResponsibilitiesThe Service agrees to:
A)
Recognize EEI's need to manage vegetation in ROW corridors for the
safe and reliable transmission of energy
.B)
Coordinate with EEI regarding ROW habitat management on Service-owned
lands and consider impacts to threatened and endangered species,
rare or sensitive plant communities, breeding/nesting of birds and
other wildlife, cultural and historic resources, orother areas of
refuge management concern.
C)
Provide EEI with wood chip disposal sites as needed for vegetation
removed from ROW's on Service-owned lands
D)
Provide EEI with a list of Service-owned lands containing EEI ROW's,
with updatescorresponding to property acquisitions.
E)
Invite EEI forestry personnel to participate in training of other
companies, industries, and entities in IVM techniques along ROW's.
VI.
Other Provisions
Nothing in this MOU is intended to conflict with current
law or regulation or the directives of the Service. If a term of
this agreement is inconsistent with such authority, then that term
shall be invalid, but the remaining terms and conditions of this
MOU shall remain in fullforce and effect.
VII.
Required ClausesA) During the performance of this MOU,
the participants agree to abide by the terms of Executive Order
11246 on non-discrimination and will not discriminate against any
person because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
The participants will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants
are employed without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national
origin.
B) No
member or delegate to Congress, or resident Commissioner, shall
be admitted to any share or part of this MOU, or to any benefit
that may arise therefrom, but this provision shall not be construed
to extend to this MOU if made with a corporation for its general
benefit.
C) Notwithstanding
any provisions herein, nothing shall commit the Service to incurring
monetary obligations for the purposes of this MOU, except to the
extent that funds are provided in Congressional Appropriations Acts.
VIII.
Terms
This agreement shall be effective for 5 (five) years from
the date of the last signature hereto and may be terminated by mutual
agreement at anytime or by either party providing thirty (30) days
written notice.
If a
modification is desired, the party desiring the change shall give
thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. The action may
be expedited by written mutual consent of both parties.
Any
provision of this MOU that is inconsistent with any federal or state
laws, regulation, policy, or procedure will be void. Any provision
inconsistent with other agreements or directives shall be resolved
by consultation and mutual consent.
IX.
Signatures
___________________________________
________________
Date
Edison
Electric Institute
___________________________________
________________
Date
U. S.
Fish and Wildlife Service
back
to top >
|